Sign in

Bombay HC directs BMC, other stakeholders to hold a meeting this week on repairing potholes

A bench of justice Shantanu Kemkar and justice PD Naik observed in a recent order the primary reason for potholes resurfacing every monsoon, despite the BMC’s claims of carried out extensive repair work, seemed to be that the civic body was “using substandard material for repair work and was repeatedly spending huge amounts of money to benefit contractors”...

Updated on: Jan 4, 2017, 12:41:15 IST
Hindusatn Times | By , Mumbai
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Bombay high court has asked the city civic body to bring its departments together and come up with ways to make better, more lasting repairs of potholes across roads in Mumbai.

The court even set a date for this meeting — January 5 — that is to be attended by senior officials from BMC, MMRDA, PWD, MSRDC and the Bombay Port Trust,  to ensure potholes do not reappear every monsoon season. (HT file photo)
The court even set a date for this meeting — January 5 — that is to be attended by senior officials from BMC, MMRDA, PWD, MSRDC and the Bombay Port Trust, to ensure potholes do not reappear every monsoon season. (HT file photo)

The court even set a date for this meeting — January 5 — that is to be attended by senior officials from the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), MMRDA, PWD, MSRDC and the Mumbai Port Trust, to “ensure potholes do not reappear every monsoon season”.

A bench of justice Shantanu Kemkar and justice PD Naik observed in a recent order the primary reason for potholes resurfacing every monsoon, despite the BMC’s claims of carried out extensive repair work, seemed to be that the civic body was “using substandard material for repair work and was repeatedly spending huge amounts of money to benefit contractors”.

The bench said the meeting must be attended by officials “not below the rank of Executive Engineer” and that the corporation must file a “compliance report and details of the decisions taken in the meeting by February 17, 2017”.

The bench also asked all stakeholders to let go of their “attitude of passing the buck”. Instead, “ensure compliance” of the court’s various orders on the issue, it said.

On the next date of hearing, the PWD has also been directed to submit a separate reply about the steps that can be taken to repair potholes and damages on the Western Express Highway and to fix a deadline for repair work there. The directions came while the bench was hearing a suo moto Public Interest Litigation on the poor condition of roads in Mumbai and the BMC’s failure to prevent potholes every monsoon.

During the last hearing on October 25, 2016, the BMC claimed all roads in the city would become pothole free by October 31 that year. The corporation, however, failed to keep its word. The bench then directed it to conduct the meeting and file the compliance report.

For more than a year now, the high court has been following up with the BMC to ensure Mumbai’s roads are pothole-free.

On the last hearing, the bench directed the BMC to not just rely on road repair material used by its contractors, but to procure “good material and seek the help of experts from IIT, Central Road Research Institute and the Indian Road Congress”.

The bench also suggested the corporation consults the civic authorities of other states in the country that get heavy rain. The HC is likely to take up the matter for further hearing on February 27.

Also read: After road scam, Mumbai civic body to monitor work in wards

  • Ayesha Arvind
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Ayesha Arvind

    Ayesha Arvind is a Senior Assistant Editor specialising in legal and judicial reportage. She covers High Courts and tribunals across southern India, and believes that important legal developments do not only come from New Delhi. Her work focuses on bringing significant decisions and developments from the region to a wider audience and explaining what they mean beyond the courtroom. She tries to make legal material accessible by translating legal jargon into clear, readable prose and putting pleas, lawsuits, judgments and legal developments in context. She also looks at their political realities and practical consequences for people. Ayesha is committed to the standards of integrity journalism requires. She places a premium on accuracy and fairness, and believes that journalism's powerful voice must be tempered by humility and a sense of proportion. Over almost two decades in journalism, she has covered law and order, civil law, crime and other areas of legal affairs. Her work includes breaking news, legal affairs stories, online analysis and commentary. Ayesha is deeply interested in the law, court judgments and the Constitution because they shape everyday life. She believes every citizen should have a basic understanding of them. What she enjoys most about covering courts is that every story brings something new to learn.Read More