Marrying with false promises amounts to fraud: Family court
Persuading a girl for marriage by painting a rosy picture amounts to fraud, a Mumbai family court held while annulling a marriage.
Noting that the husband had no property of his own and also lacked reputation, but made false claims and persuaded the woman to marry him, family court judge SA Morey held that this amounted to fraud on part of the man. Also as the woman’s consent was obtained based on false claims, the marriage was a nullity.
The woman had approached the family court, seeking annulment of her marriage alleging that her husband had made false representation about his financial status, family reputation and character.
According to her petition, both the husband and the wife worked in the same company and became friends. She alleged that the man influenced her with false claims. “He falsely stated that he belongs to good family and own house in Bhandup. He further claimed he did not consume alcohol and had no other vices,” it added.
He proposed marriage in January 2014 but she wanted to speak to her parents before making a decision. The woman alleged that a month later, the man started pressuring her for marriage and they were married in February 2014 without the consent of her parents.
The woman claimed during her month-long stay in her matrimonial home, she realised all claims made by her husband were false. She was shocked when she found her husband coming home late at home in a drunken state. She realised she was duped and came back to her parents in March 2014 and moved family court seeking annulment of the marriage.
The family court annulled the marriage on grounds of fraud saying that consent of the wife was obtained under undue influence. “The respondent exercised undue influence, by painting rosy pictures and talking sweet with petitioner had obtained her consent fraudulently; therefore there is positive assertion of the status of respondent's family, his property, which affects the consent of petitioner,” the court said.
Highlighting that the COVID-19 positivity is on the rise, Karnataka Health Minister K Sudhakar on Thursday said only 17 per cent of people have taken booster shots, and urged all to get the additional dose of the vaccine. "Not taking the booster dose of the COVID-19 vaccine even when it has been made available free for everyone amounts to negligence and we as responsible citizens must avail it to enhance immunity," Sudhakar said.
Three more witnesses, including two policemen, were examined in the Gauri Lankesh murder trial at the special court for Karnataka Control of Organised Crime on Thursday. Trial Judge CM Joshi presided over the trial. Police inspector Shiva Reddy, who arrived at the murder scene was examined by the special public prosecutor and also questioned by the defence. The second witness who was examined on Thursday was Public Works Department, assistant engineer, VN Kalageri.
Compensation against land acquired for the Ambala ring road project will be disbursed to land owners from next week, officials of the district administration said on Thursday. “NHAI has already released ₹150 crore for land compensation. Further process for disbursement will be initiated by the district revenue officer,” said Kuldeep Chand, an official from the technical branch of NHAI's Ambala zone office.
While the first decade of 2000s began with the launch of several self-financed courses at Panjab University, envisaging them as money-spinners, not all courses have managed financial viability in the long run. University Institute of Applied Management Sciences and University Institute of Legal Studies are generating surplus revenue. Even in the next near, the income of ₹7.05 crore fell short of the expenditure of ₹20.55 crore.
Thieves broke into a house in Sector 8-C while the family was away at Shimla, and decamped with ₹3.5 lakh in cash and some gold jewellery. On returning home on August 10, they found the cupboards in their house ransacked and ₹3.5 lakh in cash, along with gold jewellery, missing. On The complainant, a retired bank officer's complaint, Jagdeep Singh, police lodged an FIR under Sections 380 (theft) and 457 (house-trespass) of the Indian Penal Code at the Sector-3 police station.