New Delhi -°C
Today in New Delhi, India

Nov 21, 2019-Thursday
-°C

Humidity
-

Wind
-

Select city

Metro cities - Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai, Kolkata

Other cities - Noida, Gurgaon, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Bhopal , Chandigarh , Dehradun, Indore, Jaipur, Lucknow, Patna, Ranchi

Thursday, Nov 21, 2019

Rules from 1993 waived as Margaret Atwood, Bernardine Evaristo win 2019 Booker Prize for Fiction

Atwood, who last won the prize in 2000 for ‘The Blind Assassin’, won the 2019 prize for her ‘The Testaments’, while Evaristo, the first black woman to win the prize, was awarded for ‘Girl, Woman, Other’. They will share the £50,000 prize money.

world Updated: Oct 15, 2019 15:37 IST
Prasun Sonwalkar
Prasun Sonwalkar
Hindustan Times, London
Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo jointly win the Booker Prize for Fiction 2019 at the Guildhall in London, Britain.
Margaret Atwood and Bernardine Evaristo jointly win the Booker Prize for Fiction 2019 at the Guildhall in London, Britain.(Photo: Reuters)
         

Noted writer Margaret Atwood and Anglo-Nigerian Bernardine Evaristo were on Monday night announced joint winners of the 2019 Booker Prize for Fiction, waiving rules instituted in 1993 that ensured only one winner is decided every year.

Atwood, who last won the prize in 2000 for ‘The Blind Assassin’, won the 2019 prize for her ‘The Testaments’, while Evaristo, the first black woman to win the prize, was awarded for ‘Girl, Woman, Other’. They will share the £50,000 prize money.

Missing out on the prize was the 1981 winner Salman Rushdie, who was shortlisted for his new book, ‘Quichotte’.

Judges of the prize described Atwood’s book as “a savage and beautiful novel that speaks to us today with conviction and power. The bar is set unusually high for Atwood. She soars.” Evaristo’s book was described as a “must-read about modern Britain and womanhood”.

Peter Florence, chair of the judges, said: “This ten-month process has been a wild adventure. In the room today we talked for five hours about books we love. Two novels we cannot compromise on. They are both phenomenal books that will delight readers and will resonate for ages to come.”

Gaby Wood of the Booker Prize Foundation added: “Over an agonising five hours, the judges discussed all of the much-loved books on their shortlist, and found it impossible to single out one winner. They were not so much divided as unwilling to jettison any more when they finally got down to two, and asked if they might split the prize between them”.

“On being told that it was definitively against the rules, the judges held a further discussion and chose to flout them. They left the judging room happy and proud, their twin winners gesturing towards the six they would have wanted, had it been possible to split the prize any further.”