Supreme Court adjourns BCCI hearing on Lodha reforms until July 4

Supreme Court had earlier agreed to reconsider RM Lodha-led panel’s ‘one state, one vote’ mandate that quashed the voting rights of regional affiliates of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)

The Supreme Court’s three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra, on Friday adjourned the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) hearing on the implementation of Justice (Retd.) RM Lodha-led panel reforms until July 4.

Acting BCCI secretary Amitabh Choudhary had declared that twelve state associations of the BCCI had informed the Supreme Court that they are ready to implement the recommendation barring four exceptions. (Hindustan Times via Getty Images)

Earlier, the apex court had agreed to reconsider ‘one state, one vote’ mandate that quashed the voting rights of regional affiliates of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

READ | BCCI Committee of Administrators open to review one state, one vote

The Supreme Court had made the decision keeping in view the fact that cricket associates and former great players of many states have played historic roles which cannot be left out.

The reconsideration means that if the 2016 judgment is reversed, the states with multiple cricket associations such as Gujarat and Maharashtra can vote on a rotational basis.

The top court had also made it clear that until it finalises the BCCI constitution, no state association can hold elections.

READ | Telangana Cricket Association requests associate member status from BCCI

On Thursday, acting BCCI secretary Amitabh Choudhary had declared that twelve state associations of the BCCI had informed the Supreme Court that they are ready to implement the recommendation barring four exceptions.

The 12 state associations that have sent the undertaking are Andhra, Assam, Goa, Jharkhand, Kerala, Mumbai, Rajasthan, Railways, Tripura, Universities, Uttar Pradesh, Vidarbha, Association of Indian Universities.

These associations are finding it difficult to implement four reforms i.e one state, one vote, the three-year cooling-off period after a term, the constitution of the apex council and distribution of power and duties between elected council and BCCI officials.

READ | Indian cricket team can win day-night Test: Sourav Ganguly

In a landmark judgment on July 18, 2016, the SC had accepted major recommendations of Justice (Retd.) R.M. Lodha-led panel on structural reforms in the BCCI-- including one state, one vote, ‘one member, one post’ and fixing a 70-year age-cap on those occupying BCCI posts.