Judges differ on banning smoking in films
The much-debated issue of banning smoking in cinema has left a Delhi High Court bench divided, forcing it to refer the matter to another court on Thursday.
The division bench comprising of Justices Mukul Mudgal and Sanjiv Khanna was to pronounce the verdict on Thursday, but could not do so as the two judges had formed different opinions on whether smoking scenes be shown in the movies. They had reserved the ruling for more than six months.
Justice Mudgal in his judgement has stressed the point that banning smoking in films will hamper the right to freedom of speech and expression.
"The blanket restriction put on the scenes of smoking in all films and television serials even with the editorial justification cannot be sustained, as it is, in my view, unreasonable and violates Article 19(1)(a) for that reason," said Justice Mudgal in his order.
Such a blanket ban would clearly proscribe the depiction of what actually transpires in life in this country and curb artistic expression and creative freedom contrary to the law laid down, he said.
Justice Mudgal cited examples from the TV serials based on Mahabharata and Ramayana, in which scenes of gambling, kidnapping and deceit were shown, and said such depictions cannot be legitimately prohibited to promote a morally idealistic society.
"Imagine a movie where all is well and every character is moral and obeys the laws and is happy and contended. Such a script, apart from being very boring, also necessarily has to be very short," said Mudgal in his order.
Justice Khanna completely differed from him and referred the matter to the chief justice's court for Feb 14.
The high court July 25 last year reserved its order on the petition of filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt challenging the validity of the Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production and Supply Act, 2003, which bans smoking scenes in films.
The act also imposes smoking ban in the public places.
Pune police on Tuesday booked Satish Kumbhani, founder and owner of BitConnect, an investment platform, for allegedly duping Pune-based lawyer in a multi-core scam. According to police, A lawyer based in Kondhwa Budruk has lodged complaint at cybercrime police station on Tuesday. In 2016, the lawyer has invested ₹49 lakh in 54 bitcoins and the accused assured him returns of 166 bitcoins.
Police on Wednesday arrested two brothers for allegedly raping a minor girl adopted by their parents over the course of two years. The girl had attempted suicide in the Muslim Yateemkhana in Parade on August 14 night and was admitted to UHM hospital, where she shared her ordeal. Police investigations have found that one of the brothers had made a video of the girl, now 16, and used it to blackmail and rape her.
Police have arrested the school headmaster Vijay Kushwaha after a class 6 student of a primary school in Pipauli Shiv village of Auraiya district was left locked in the school toilet for 19 hours on August 5. The matter came to light the next day when the school opened. On August 5, the child went to the school toilet around 2 pm. After locking the classrooms, the staff locked the toilet too.
Mumbai Raising concerns over the news report that a pregnant woman from Palghar lost her twin babies as she could not be taken to the hospital in time, the Bombay high court (HC) has asked the state government to take immediate action and make medical facilities accessible to expectant mothers and infants in tribal areas. Advocate Jugal Kishore Gilda submitted that the issue was of some doctors who are appointed on contractual basis, but not reporting on duty.
Mumbai A 67-year-old retired sales tax officer was duped of ₹1.04 lakh after hThe complainant, Madhukar Sankheposted a return request on Amazon for a package he had ordered. This is the second case in the past two weeks where frauds have targeted Amazon customers. The complainant, Madhukar Sankhe, had on August 9, ordered a pair of sports shoes on Amazon by paying an amount of ₹1,150 through his credit card and received it on Monday.