
SC puts Centre, UP govt on notice
The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh Government on a petition seeking a CBI probe into the Ghaziabad provident fund scam, allegedly involving 36 judges.
A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India KG Balakrishnan asked the Centre and the Uttar Pradesh Government to respond to the petition filed by Ghaziabad Bar Asociation by August one, the next date of hearing.
It however, turned down a suggestion by senior counsel Anil B Divan for the investigation to be supervised by a senior retired police officer.
“This is a criminal case with a serious ramifications…A retired police officer cannot be allowed under the law to supervise serving police officers,” the court said making it clear that the probe had to be in accordance with the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code.
The hearing of the case that was held in an open court, witnessed a spat between the CJI and senior advocate Shanti Bhushan with the latter saying Justice Balakrishnan could not hear a petition challenging his administrative decisions relating to the scam probe.
Bhushan, who appeared on behalf of Transparency International (India), pointed out that since the petition challenged the CJI’s administrative decisions, he should not hear the matter.
Referring to a newspaper report, Bhushan said SC Secretary General V.K. Jain had written to Ghaziabad SSP that he should prepare a questionnaire for examining the Judges of the higher judiciary allegedly involved in the scam for prior vetting. The questionnaire would form the basis of the probe.
Terming it as “unheard of”, the senior advocate said there could not be different sets of procedures for judges and other people involved in a corruption case.
The CJI said the petition did not challenge his administrative decision, in asmuch as its prayer related only to judicial officers (subordinate court judges) while his decision was with regard to Allahabad High Court Judges, he clarified. According to the Supreme Court ruling in the Veeraswami case, a high court or Supreme Court judge cannot be proceeded against in a criminal case without the prior permission of the CJI.
“If you want a sitting high court judge to be interrogated by a constable you amend your prayer (to include high court judges), Somebody else (some other bench) will hear it,” the CJI said.

The singer confesses

Koli held guilty in 12th Nithari murder case, employer Pandher acquitted

Two Chinese nationals among 12 nabbed for defrauding ‘thousands’

Poultry sale resumes after brief pause, traders say demand low

3 die in blaze at scrap godown in Kirti Nagar

BJP drove MCDs to bankruptcy, alleges AAP; BJP hits

DTC places order for 1,000 new buses; another promise delivered, tweets Kejriwal

Hospital staff upbeat a day before first jabs

Covid beds at Delhi’s pvt hospitals reduced further

HC asks Delhi MCDs to list non-essential expenses

Vaccine drive to start at 81 sites in Delhi tomorrow, CM to visit LNJP hospital

Delhi's Covid-19 positivity rate at an all-time low of 0.44%: Satyendar Jain

Flying of UAVs, paragliders prohibited over Delhi ahead of Republic Day

Court directs UP police to produce AAP MLA Somnath Bharti in Delhi
