NTA yet to declare UGC-NET results after a month of exam
UGC-NET determines eligibility for admission to PhD programmes, recruitment as assistant professors, and the award of Junior Research Fellowships.
More than a month after the June 2026 University Grants Commission-National Eligibility Test (UGC-NET) concluded, the National Testing Agency (NTA) is yet to release either the provisional answer keys or the results, leaving thousands of candidates anxious over the prolonged wait.

UGC-NET, conducted twice a year in computer-based mode, determines eligibility for admission to PhD programmes, recruitment as assistant professors, and the award of Junior Research Fellowships (JRF). The June session was held from June 22 to June 30 across 87 subjects.
Candidates have repeatedly urged the agency to publish the provisional answer keys before announcing the results. The answer keys enable students to verify their responses, estimate their scores and, if necessary, challenge any discrepancies before the final results are prepared based on final answer keys.
The delay has also sparked concerns over the lack of official communication from the testing agency.
“The delay has led to me checking for UGC-NET updates every day and has created constant uncertainty. I have done fairly well in the exam and do not want to prepare for a re-exam when I have other examinations lined up in the coming months,” said Sanket Kumar, a student at Jawaharlal Nehru University’s School of Environmental Studies.
He added that the agency had not clarified whether there had been any paper leak or what steps it was taking to address the situation. “There is no transparency from their end, which ultimately makes students anxious. It has been a horrible handling of the situation by the NTA,” he said.
The delay is significantly longer than last year’s timeline. In 2025, the June session was conducted between June 25 and June 29, while the provisional answer keys were released on July 5. For the December 2025-January 2026 cycle, held between December 31 and January 7, the answer keys were published on January 14.
On July 30, the Students’ Federation of India (SFI) demanded that the NTA immediately release the provisional answer keys and announce a clear schedule for the objection window, final answer key and declaration of results. The student organisation also sought greater transparency in examination processes and accountability for what it described as “repeated administrative failures” by the agency.
Neither NTA nor Union education ministry responded to HT’s queries.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABOUT THE AUTHORSanjay MauryaSanjay Maurya is a Principal Correspondent with Hindustan Times, where he covers education, with a focus on school and higher education, competitive examinations, education policy and governance. Working as part of the National Bureau, he is based in New Delhi and reports on the Ministry of Education and covers various statutory bodies like UGC, AICTE and NCTE and autonomous bodies like CBSE and NCERT. His reporting also tracks the implementation of key government reforms and policies from school education to higher education including in IITs, NITs, IIMs, central and state universities, and their impact on students and educational institutions. His reporting on the irregularities and rushed implementation of CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system for evaluation of Class 12 board exams 2026, triggered administrative action, leading to the transfer of the board's two senior-most officials and the constitution of a committee to probe alleged irregularities in procurement process of the system. He joined Hindustan Times in December 2024. Prior to that, he had a three-year stint at Careers360, where he reported on school and higher education, entrance examinations, admissions, rankings and various education policies involving universities and professional education bodies. Over the years, Maurya has reported extensively on major developments in India's education sector, including the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, reforms in the National Testing Agency (NTA) following the NEET-UG 2024 controversy, changes in school education, higher education regulation, and the evolution of entrance examinations such as NEET, JEE and CUET. He regularly produces data-driven and explanatory stories based on government documents, parliamentary proceedings, court records and official data. His focus remains on helping readers understand how education policies and institutional decisions affect millions of students, teachers and educational institutions across the country.Read More

E-Paper


