Sign in

Over 45% UP pradhans not even class 8 pass

Well, this may be a subject of heated debate with the cogent arguments for and against the proposition as happened in Rajasthan where the governor recently unleashed a debate by promulgating an ordinance just a few weeks before the panchayat polls.

Updated on: Feb 16, 2015, 15:52:00 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Lucknow
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Should Uttar Pradesh emulate its neighbouring state Rajasthan by fixing minimum educational qualification for contesting panchayat polls, the cradle of democracy?

Article image

Well, this may be a subject of heated debate with the cogent arguments for and against the proposition as happened in Rajasthan where the governor recently unleashed a debate by promulgating an ordinance just a few weeks before the panchayat polls.

The ordinance has made it mandatory for contesting zila panchayat and panchayat samiti polls to be class 10 pass and those contesting sarpanch (pradhan) election to be class 8 pass.

Regardless of the merits and the demerits of any such move here, the fact remains that more than 45% the existing pradhans would have been disqualified from contesting panchayat election in 2010 had they been required to be class 8 pass.

As many as 3,000 of the sitting pradhans in UP are unlettered and give thumb impressions when it comes to signing a cheque or any other paper while another 13,475 pradhans are just literate. In other words, they can only struggle to sign a document without being aware of the content.

The information available with the state election commission here, about the educational background of the panchayat representatives elected in the 2010 elections reveal that only 28,500 out of a total around 51,000 pradhans are 8th pass or have qualification above that.

In some districts, almost half the pradhans are illiterate. For example, Badaun has 233 illiterate pradhans, Hardoi and Bahraich have 117 and 116 unlettered pradhans, respectively, who supposedly put their thumb impressions on the dotted lines.

The situation is no better at the kshetra panchayat and the zila panchayat level either.

The first panchayat elections (after the Constitutional amendment) in 1995 threw more than 22 .55% illiterate representatives at the grass-root level and the number of illiterate representatives surprisingly only grew to 23.95 % 10 years later in 2005-06 elections even though the overall literacy rate might have gone up in a decade.

The next village panchayat elections in the state are due in July-August this year only and the state is unlikely to get a cue from Rajasthan. Sources said the Centre had in the past held a few meetings with the states to know whether they deemed it desirable or not to fix a minimum educational qualification for the panchayat elections.

“But we have always opposed the idea on the ground that fixation of the educational qualification will deprive the poor people of their right to be elected,” revealed a panchayati raj department official. He argued when there was no minimum educational qualification fixed for the assembly and parliamentary elections, there was no logic for doing it for the grass-root elections.

“However, fixing educational qualifications for panchayat polls may certainly give a push to the literacy level in villages which in turn may produce educated MLAs and MPs too,” admitted another official. He said with the educated pradhans, the block functionaries will also find it difficult to make them sign checques on the dotted lines to siphon off funds.

  • Brajendra K Parashar
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Brajendra K Parashar

    Brajendra K Parashar is a Senior Journalist with the Hindustan Times, based in Lucknow, with nearly three decades of experience covering governance, public policy, politics and development in Uttar Pradesh. Over the years, he has reported extensively on key sectors, including energy and renewable power, mobility and transport, road safety, agriculture and allied sectors and issues related to farmers, rural development, taxation under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and public administration. A seasoned political correspondent, Parashar closely tracks the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and has covered every major election in Uttar Pradesh right from three-tier panchayat elections and urban local body polls to Assembly and Lok Sabha elections. He also reports regularly on the proceedings of the Uttar Pradesh Legislature, bureaucracy, governance, policy decisions and administrative developments with focus on their impact on public life. His reporting is known for its strong analytical approach, extensive use of official data. His areas of interests include investigative journalism, long-form political and policy analysis, data-driven reporting, elections and institutional reforms. Parashar holds a postgraduate degree in Political Science with First Division from Aligarh Muslim University (AMU), followed by a Diploma in Journalism and Mass Communication from the same university. His inclination towards journalism began during his student days, when he regularly contributed letters to editors and articles to newspapers and magazines. In the mid-1990S, his essay, “Should India Switch Over to the Presidential Form Of Government?”, published in Politics India magazine edited by noted constitutional expert Subhash C Kashyap, was adjudged the best entry in a national competition. His work has received professional recognition, including the Hindustan Times Journalist of the Month Award for an impactful series on drinking water issues during the 2010 Lok Sabha election campaign. Originally from Kasganj in western Uttar Pradesh, Parashar is currently based in Lucknow where continues to report on politics, governance and public policy.Read More