Sign in

CBI has done ‘bare minumum’ in Dabholkar case, says Bombay HC

The Bombay high court on Wednesday directed the joint director of the CBI to file a report explaining the reason behind the slow progress made in the probe.

Published on: Nov 23, 2016, 23:35:39 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Mumbai
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Bombay high court on Wednesday directed the joint director of the Central Bureau of investigation (CBI) to file a report explaining the reason behind the slack progress made in the probe of rationalist Narendra Dabholkar’s murder case.

The bench also rejected the CBI’s request to defer the trial in rationalist Narendra Dabholkar’s murder case (HT File Photo)
The bench also rejected the CBI’s request to defer the trial in rationalist Narendra Dabholkar’s murder case (HT File Photo)

An HC division bench also directed the state government’s counsel, Mankunwar Deshmuk to ask the Additional Director General of the state CID for a rough estimate of the time it will take for them to make a concrete headway in the murder probe of communist leader Govind Pansare.

The bench went through the status reports submitted by both agencies in the cases and said it was “not satisfied” with the progress made. It said the steps taken so far were just “bare minimum” in any murder case and that the agencies had simply been wiling away time and seeking additional time one court hearing after another.

The bench also rejected the CBI’s request to defer the trial in the Dabholkar case until it manages to secure the the ballistics report from the United Kingdom’s Scotland Yard of the two cases and murder case of Kannada scholar MM Kalburgi.

The court said, “No one in the society is was safe today, be it government school teachers, activists, public leaders, or politicians and yet, the state has failed to take any steps to make lives any safer.”

It directed both the agencies to “prove their sincerity” by taking steps to apprehend those responsible for the murder and build a strong case against them. “We have given you enough time but are not satisfied with your efforts. Besides, why aren’t all the agencies probing these cases coordinating with each other? The CBI claims to have uploaded the photos of the suspects on its website. Is the state CID not aware of the website? Can’t its officers have a look and make efforts to identify them?” the bench said.

The observations came while the bench was hearing a plea filed by the kin of both Dabholkar and Pansare seeking that the court monitor the probe. It has now scheduled the matter for further hearing on December 16.

  • Ayesha Arvind
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Ayesha Arvind

    Ayesha Arvind is a Senior Assistant Editor specialising in legal and judicial reportage. She covers High Courts and tribunals across southern India, and believes that important legal developments do not only come from New Delhi. Her work focuses on bringing significant decisions and developments from the region to a wider audience and explaining what they mean beyond the courtroom. She tries to make legal material accessible by translating legal jargon into clear, readable prose and putting pleas, lawsuits, judgments and legal developments in context. She also looks at their political realities and practical consequences for people. Ayesha is committed to the standards of integrity journalism requires. She places a premium on accuracy and fairness, and believes that journalism's powerful voice must be tempered by humility and a sense of proportion. Over almost two decades in journalism, she has covered law and order, civil law, crime and other areas of legal affairs. Her work includes breaking news, legal affairs stories, online analysis and commentary. Ayesha is deeply interested in the law, court judgments and the Constitution because they shape everyday life. She believes every citizen should have a basic understanding of them. What she enjoys most about covering courts is that every story brings something new to learn.Read More