Republicans face struggle over party's direction | world | Hindustan Times
  • Tuesday, May 22, 2018
  •   °C  
Today in New Delhi, India
May 22, 2018-Tuesday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

Republicans face struggle over party's direction

Stung by defeat, Grand Old Party analyses its future after losing popular votes to Democrats.

world Updated: Nov 08, 2012 02:39 IST

Mitt Romney's loss to a Democratic president wounded by a weak economy is certain to spur an internecine struggle over the future of the Republican Party, but the strength of the party's conservatives in Congress and the rightward tilt of the next generation of party leaders could limit any course correction.

With their party on the verge of losing the popular presidential vote for the fifth time in six elections, Republicans across the political spectrum anticipate a prolonged and probably divisive period of self-examination. The coming debate will be centered on whether the party should keep pursuing the anti-government focus that grew out of resistance to the health care law and won them the House in 2010, or whether it should focus on a strategy that recognises the demographic tide running strongly against it.

"There will be some kind of war," predicted Mike Murphy, a longtime Republican Party consultant, suggesting it would pit "mathematicians" like him, who argue that the party cannot keep surrendering the votes of Hispanics, blacks, younger voters and college-educated women, against the party purists, or "priests," as he puts it, who believe that basic conservative principles can ultimately triumph without much deviation. "We are in a situation where the Democrats are getting a massive amount of votes for free," Murphy said.

But the debate will not just be about demographics. Ralph Reed, a veteran of the conservative movement, said that Romney's loss would stir resentment among those who believe the party made a mistake in nominating a more centrist Republican who had to work to appeal to the party's base.

"There's definitely a feeling that it would be better to nominate a conservative of long-standing conviction," he said.

As a party, Republicans continue to depend heavily on older working-class white voters in rural and suburban America - a shrinking percentage of the overall electorate - while Democrats rack up huge majorities among urban voters including blacks, Hispanics and other minorities. Not to mention younger Americans who are inclined to get their political news from Comedy Central and will not necessarily become more conservative as they age. The disparity means that Democrats can get well under 50% of the white vote and still win the presidency, a split that is only going to widen in the future. According to exit polls, about 7 in 10 Hispanics said they were voting for President Barack Obama. Romney won the support of nearly 6 in 10 whites. In urban areas, white voters were split over the two candidates, but about 6 in 10 white voters in the suburbs went for Romney, as did nearly two-thirds in rural areas.

Romney won a majority of voters 65 or older, while Obama was backed by 6 in 10 Americans younger than 30, and won a narrow majority of those younger than 44. Even as they absorbed Romney's defeat, the party's top elected officials, strategists and activists said they believed that Republicans had offered a persuasive message of economic opportunism and fiscal restraint. While the messenger may have been flawed, they argued, Republicans should not stray from that approach. "The party has to continually ask ourselves, what do we represent?" said senator Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican. "But we have to remain the movement on behalf of upward mobility, the party people identify with their hopes and dreams. People want to have a chance."