Sign in

Chintels: Residents get SC stay on order to vacate 3 towers

The flat owners had appealed to the Supreme Court against the decision of the deputy commissioner, which they pointed out did not mention anything about offering them compensation, rent or offer of reconstruction, which has been offered to owners of six other towers to be demolished in the same complex

Published on: Mar 26, 2025, 06:40:18 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
Copy link
  • copy link

Gurugram: A group of flat owners in the Chintels Paradiso condominium have got a stay from the Supreme Court on the district administration’s order to vacate Towers A, B and C of the condominium, which had earlier been deemed unsafe after a structural audit, residents living in the three towers said.

The owners of three tower Chintels Paradiso A, B and C have taken a stay order from the Supreme Court against the order of Gurugram Deputy Commissioner to vacate the towers on Tuesday. (HT PHOTO)
The owners of three tower Chintels Paradiso A, B and C have taken a stay order from the Supreme Court against the order of Gurugram Deputy Commissioner to vacate the towers on Tuesday. (HT PHOTO)

A bench of the apex court on Monday granted a stay on a petition filed by flat owners of Chintels Paradiso, against the Gurugram deputy commissioner’s order to vacate the three towers within 15 days. The order was issued last week.

The flat owners had appealed to the Supreme Court against the decision of the deputy commissioner, which they pointed out did not mention anything about offering them compensation, rent or offer of reconstruction, which has been offered to owners of six other towers to be demolished in the same complex.

Chintels Paradiso has nine towers out of which six towers have already been declared unsafe, and the developer has been given permission to demolish these six towers (D, E, F, G, H and J). The three remaining towers A, B and C were also declared unsafe in February and will be demolished once these are vacated.

Rakesh Hooda, president, Chintels RWA and one of the petitioners, who owns a flat in Tower A said that 22 flat owners of Towers A, C and J had approached the apex court and sought an urgent hearing, which was held on Monday against the order of deputy commissioner, Gurugram, directing the flat owners of these towers to vacate the flats within 15 days.

“We had sought relief due to the fact that there is no mention of payment of rent in the extant order, the developer has not offered any reconstruction offer to owners of these towers and we have also demanded that ₹1000 psf reconstruction charges being asked for by the developer should be waived,” he said.

Hooda said the bench of Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan granted a stay in the matter and asked the developer to file a reply on the next date of hearing on April 9.

Chintels India Ltd, vice president, JN Yadav confirmed the development and said that they will file a reply in the apex court on the next date of hearing. “We have paid compensation to the owners of six towers and we will pay compensation to the owners of these three towers as well. The directions of the Supreme Court will be followed. We have already complied with the directions of the district administration and state government in this matter. We are paying rent to flat owners, paid them compensation and all levies as per government directions. The company, has however, decided that we will pay only compensation to owners of Tower A, B and C and will not make the offer of reconstruction,” he said.

The Gurugram district administration had on Wednesday invoked the Disaster Management Act, 2005, and issued directions to the flat owners of Tower A, B and C to vacate the flats within 15 days.

  • Abhishek Behl
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Abhishek Behl

    Abhishek Behl is a Special Correspondent with Hindustan Times, Gurugram bureau. With over a decade of experience in journalism, he reports on Gurugram's rapid urban transformation, covering the city's changing infrastructure, governance, and planning landscape. His reporting spans major civic agencies, such as the Gurugram Metropolitan Development Authority (GMDA), Department of Town and Country Planning (DTCP), Haryana Shahari Vikas Pradhikaran (HSVP), and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI). Behl has reported on key urban development issues such as RRTS projects, metro expansion, road and highway projects, water supply, drainage, mobility, environmental concerns, land use planning, affordable housing, and the city's real estate sector. He closely tracks policy decisions, infrastructure implementation, and their impact on the city and its residents. He also covers regulatory action against illegal constructions, urban flooding, traffic management, and initiatives aimed at improving civic services and sustainable development. Behl has also written on political developments in south Haryana, focusing on elections and governance. His journalism is driven by fact-based reporting, ground-level coverage, and an understanding of the social and economic dynamics of Gurugram. Apart from work he is a cyclist and a cricketer and a resident of Palam Vihar since 2010.Read More