Sign in

India rejects references to Kashmir, CPEC in China-Pak joint statement

The response from India came three days after China and Pakistan issued the joint statement following a meeting between President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Imran Khan in Beijing on February 6.

Published on: Feb 10, 2022, 24:39:25 IST
By , Hindustan Times, New Delhi
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

India on Wednesday rejected references — to Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) and an economic corridor passing through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) — made in a China-Pakistan joint statement and called on the two countries to not interfere in India’s internal affairs or to alter the status quo in the area illegally occupied by Pakistan.

The joint statement had contained numerous references to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) that passes via PoK. India has not signed on for the BRI and has consistently opposed the CPEC. (Representational Photo)
The joint statement had contained numerous references to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) that passes via PoK. India has not signed on for the BRI and has consistently opposed the CPEC. (Representational Photo)

The response from India came three days after China and Pakistan issued the joint statement following a meeting between President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Imran Khan in Beijing on February 6. China had opposed what it said were “any unilateral actions” in J&K – an apparent reference to India’s 2019 decision to scrap the special status of the region.

The joint statement had contained numerous references to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a flagship project of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) that passes via PoK. India has not signed on for the BRI and has consistently opposed the CPEC.

Pointing to the said references, external affairs ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said: “We have always rejected such references and our position is well known to China and Pakistan.”

He added, “In this instance too, we reject reference to J&K in the joint statement. The Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and the Union Territory of Ladakh have been, are and will always remain integral and inalienable parts of India. We expect the parties concerned not to interfere in matters that are internal affairs of India.”

Bagchi said, India has “consistently conveyed our concerns to China and Pakistan on the projects in the so-called CPEC, which are in India’s territory that has been illegally occupied by Pakistan”.

He added, “We resolutely oppose any attempts to change the status quo by other countries, as also by Pakistan, in the areas under the illegal occupation of Pakistan. We call upon the parties concerned to cease such activities.”

The joint statement had said the Pakistan side briefed the Chinese side on the latest developments in J&K, “including its concerns, position and pressing issues”.

The statement added, “The Chinese side reiterated that the Kashmir issue was a dispute left from history, and should be properly and peacefully resolved based on the UN Charter, relevant security council resolutions and bilateral agreements. China opposes any unilateral actions that complicate the situation.”

This is a position China has taken since India ended the special status of J&K in August 2019 and split the region into two Union territories. India has always rejected China’s position on this issue as interference in the country’s internal matters. The joint statement had quoted Khan as saying that the CPEC has “significantly contributed to Pakistan’s economic and social development” and both countries had acknowledged the contribution of projects included in the corridor in strengthening Pakistan’s role in regional connectivity.

Xi and Khan had reaffirmed their commitment to “ensuring the smooth operation of completed projects and the timely completion of projects under construction”. Both sides said they will safeguard the CPEC from “all threats and negative propaganda” and also called on third parties to invest in the corridor.

  • Rezaul H Laskar
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Rezaul H Laskar

    Rezaul Hasan Laskar is Foreign Editor with the Hindustan Times, which he joined in 2015. He began as a journalist in his hometown of Shillong in northeast India and has worked in newspapers and wire services over the years. He moved to New Delhi in 1997 and initially focused on defence, national security, Jammu and Kashmir and the northeast, while also working of foreign policy and international relations. He has been part of the media delegation accompanying PMs on foreign visits and has reported from destinations ranging from Tibet to Ukraine. Between 2007 and 2013, he was the Press Trust of India correspondent in Pakistan, one of only two Indian journalists allowed to report from the country. He extensively covered Pakistan’s domestic politics and the life of the common people, as well as the fallout of the 2008 Mumbai attacks on India-Pakistan relations and the subsequent trial in Pakistan of the suspects involved in the attack. As part of his reportage in Pakistan, he travelled the breadth of the country, from the Swat Valley to Balochistan. Reza’s first gig in journalism was writing a weekly music column, and music – especially classic rock – remains a keen interest. He is also a movie buff and a keen photographer.Read More