Sign in

Karnataka election results point to bipolar polity in southern state

Congress won the Karnataka assembly elections by the biggest vote share and seats after a whopping 34 years.

Updated on: May 14, 2023, 03:40:22 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Until the counting of votes began in Karnataka the Janata Dal (Secular) or JD (S) was hoping to play kingmaker in the state. Those hopes have been crushed with the Congress winning 136 out of the 224 assembly constituencies (ACs) in the state and the JD (S)’s own seat tally coming down from 37 to 20. Will Karnataka now move towards a bipolar polity where the JD (S) increasingly becomes a marginal political force? While one must wait for at least one more election to make sure that the 2023 results are not an aberration, at least three data points suggest that 2023 is a far more bipolar election than what Karnataka has seen in a long time.

Congress supporters celebrate the party's victory in the Karnataka assembly elections, in Bengaluru on Saturday. (ANI)
Congress supporters celebrate the party's victory in the Karnataka assembly elections, in Bengaluru on Saturday. (ANI)

Vote share of top two parties is the highest since 1985

The combined vote share of the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), is 78.9%. This is the highest combined vote share of the top two parties in the state since the 1985 elections.

Vote share of top two parties in Karnataka.
Vote share of top two parties in Karnataka.

When read with the fact that the JD (S)’s vote share has dropped to 13.31%, the lowest since its debut election in 1999, this suggests a growing trend towards bipolarity in the state’s politics.

Median ENOP in 2023 is the lowest ever in Karnataka

One way to look at fragmentation (or lack of it) in voting patterns is to look at the effective number of participants (ENOP) in an election. ENOP is defined as the sum of reciprocal of squares of vote share of each candidate in a given constituency.

A higher ENOP value means that vote shares are fragmented across more candidates.
A higher ENOP value means that vote shares are fragmented across more candidates.

A higher ENOP value means that vote shares are fragmented across more candidates. Trivedi Centre for Political Data (TCPD) has data for Karnataka election results from 1978 onwards. A calculation of median ENOP values for Karnataka shows that the 2023 number, 2.3 is the lowest since 1978. This means that even at the AC level, contests were more bipolar than they have been since 1978.

To be sure, not all regions of the state are equally bipolar

A sub-region wise analysis of the median ENOP numbers shows that the fragmentation (or lack of it) of politics is different in different parts of the state. Coastal Karnataka, which has historically been polarised between the Congress and the BJP, has the lowest

ENOP in the state while central and southern Karnataka have the highest ENOP numbers.
ENOP in the state while central and southern Karnataka have the highest ENOP numbers.

ENOP in the state while central and southern Karnataka have the highest ENOP numbers. These are the sub-regions where the JD(S) has been the strongest. However, median ENOP value has gone down in every sub-region between 2018 and 2023 elections except in coastal Karnataka where it has increased marginally.

  • Nishant Ranjan
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Nishant Ranjan

    Nishant Ranjan has been working as a data journalist with Hindustan Times since 2023. In this short period, he has established a niche for creating original datasets and utilising them to produce journalistic work that pushes the boundaries of journalism. The list of datasets and stories done by him include the following: a dataset of all 717 chief ministers India has had since 1952, a dataset of all 3,350 members of India’s council of ministers, a dataset of all 190 deputy chief ministers in India and a dataset of all 279 Supreme Court judges in India (1950-2025). He has also profiled each elected Muslim MLA/MP since 1952. He is a mining engineer by training who decided to pursue a Master's in Development Studies from TISS after working in a coal mine for 10 months. He also worked as a research associate at the Centre for Policy Research, researching local governance in India. He also has a keen interest in analyzing electoral politics and political executives in India.Read More