Sign in

IVF case: Cops say ‘donors’ are reluctant to join probe

Investigation into a Delhi couple's IVF embryo mix-up is stalled as alleged donors haven't provided DNA samples, leaving the case unresolved.

Published on: Jun 26, 2026, 03:58:04 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The investigation into a Delhi couple’s allegations of an embryo “mix-up” during an IVF procedure remains inconclusive more than two months after DNA samples were collected from the couple and their twin daughters, with investigators saying the probe has stalled because the alleged donors have not yet come forward to provide samples.

Photo for representation (AP)
Photo for representation (AP)

Rahul Rathore (41) and his wife Meenu underwent IVF treatment at a fertility hospital in south Delhi’s Greater Kailash. The couple, who already have two daughters, said they opted for IVF to “expand their family”.

An investigating officer said police are still awaiting reports from the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) in Chanakyapuri and are yet to determine whether the twins are biological siblings, half-siblings or entirely unrelated.

“Based on statements of hospital doctors, who have claimed the couple were informed that donor sperm and eggs would be used, and the couple’s allegation that private DNA tests showed the girls are not their biological children, it appears the Rathores are not biologically related to the twins,” the officer said.

“The final DNA report is still pending because we also want to establish whether the girls are siblings or half-siblings or completely unrelated,” the officer added.

Investigators said they obtained details of potential donors from hospital records and approached two individuals for DNA samples more than a month ago. However, neither has joined the investigation so far. “These donors are legally entitled to anonymity. If they continue to not cooperate, we will place the available DNA findings before the court during the trial proceedings,” the officer said.

Two other officers confirmed that police are still trying to establish how many donors, if any, were involved in the IVF procedure.

A senior officer said investigators were examining multiple possibilities. “The first possibility is that no donors were used and both girls belong biologically to the couple, although this currently appears less likely. Another possibility is an embryo mix-up in which another couple’s embryo was implanted in the woman,” the officer said.

“There is also the possibility that one or both gametes used in the procedure came from donors. In that scenario, the girls may either be half-siblings or unrelated biologically. In such a case, there could have been three or even four donors involved. We have to look at every possibility.”

The controversy surfaced in January, days after the twins were born, when the couple allegedly became suspicious because the children had “different facial features”. The family subsequently approached private laboratories for DNA testing and claimed the results showed that neither child shared DNA with either parent.

Following a court intervention, an FIR was registered on March 31 under sections related to cheating, criminal breach of trust, criminal conspiracy and criminal intimidation, along with provisions of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Act. The case is being monitored by senior officers. Three doctors and a hospital official have been named in the FIR.

Police had earlier taken the couple and the twins to AIIMS between April 20 and April 22 for independent DNA sample collection.

Investigators said the probe has become complicated because of conflicting claims made by the two sides. While the couple allege an embryo mix-up, hospital officials have reportedly produced a consent form and maintained that the couple were informed their own gametes were not reproductively viable and that donor material would be used.

Police are now examining records of other couples who underwent IVF treatment at the hospital between May 10 and May 20, 2025, the period during which the Rathores underwent treatment and five embryos were allegedly implanted.

The couple, however, deny ever consenting to the use of donor sperm or eggs and have alleged that the consent documents produced by the hospital are forged. “We never agreed or gave consent for donors at any point during the treatment,” Rahul Rathore said, adding that the family was still waiting for the FSL report.

Officials at the FSL confirmed on Thursday that the DNA analysis remains pending because of a backlog of cases.

  • Jignasa Sinha
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Jignasa Sinha

    Jignasa Sinha is a Special Correspondent at Hindustan Times in New Delhi. With more than six years of reporting experience, she covers crime and policing in the national capital. Her beats also include Delhi prisons, the Delhi Fire Services and Delhi courts, while she regularly reports on gender, labour and social justice. Over the course of her career, Jignasa has reported on major criminal investigations, international crime syndicates, high-profile cyber fraud cases, law-and-order developments, protests, disasters and public institutions. Her reporting combines breaking news with in-depth, long form, human interest stories that examine the human impact of public policy, policing and the criminal justice system. In addition to reporting for the newspaper, she contributes to the Hindustan Times website and app, and plays an active role in coordinating on-ground coverage of major developments and breaking news across Delhi. Before joining Hindustan Times, Jignasa worked at The Indian Express newspaper in New Delhi, where she spent five years covering crime, Delhi airport, courts and health. She began her journalism career as an intern at an AI magazine in Bengaluru while pursuing her postgraduate diploma in multimedia journalism at the Indian Institute of Journalism and New Media.Read More

  • Ridhima Gupta
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Ridhima Gupta

    Ridhima Gupta is a Principal Correspondent at Hindustan Times, where she covers healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and public health policy. Her reporting centers on Delhi’s major hospitals (AIIMS, Safdarjung, Lok Nayak), the state health department, and emerging medical trends. Ridhima is particularly interested in reporting on healthcare issues through the lens of women, children, and persons with disabilities. Her work often explores the intersection of healthcare and public policy, examining how these factors shape access health care. Based in New Delhi, many of her reports have led to direct government action over the years, in different city. Earlier this year, she completed a media training workshop on the Impact of Extreme Heat on Health, organised by the Global Strategic Communications Council (GSCC), further strengthening her interest in reporting on the intersection of climate change and public health. A postgraduate from the Asian College of Journalism, Chennai, Ridhima has around a decade of experience in journalism. She began her career as a trainee television reporter with Mirror Now in Mumbai and has since worked across multiple cities, including Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Delhi, contributing to both print and broadcast newsrooms. She is a recipient of the Laadli Media Fellowship (2022) for her reporting on education, disability, and women’s issues. Before joining Hindustan Times, Ridhima worked with The Times of India, New Indian Express and News18. A native of Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, Ridhima completed her undergraduate studies in Biotechnology. And when she is not working as a journalist she likes to paint and go on nature hikes.Read More

Catch every big hit, every wicket with Crickit, a one stop destination for Live Scores, Match Stats, Infographics & much more. Explore now!

Stay updated with all top Cities including, Bengaluru, Delhi, Mumbai and more across India. Stay informed on the latest happenings in World News along with Delhi Election 2025 and Delhi Election Result 2025 Live, New Delhi Election Result Live, Kalkaji Election Result Live at Hindustan Times.