Nothing more unfair than RTM: Ashwin criticizes IPL rule

The auction for the IPL 2025 will be taking place at the end of this year. Earlier in August, The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) organised a "constructive dialogue" with the owners of the ten league franchises on various subjects before formulating the IPL player regulations.

Chennai [India], : Indian spinner Ravichandran Ashwin criticised the Right to Match rule, which could make its return during the auctions this year for the next year's Indian Premier League .

Nothing more unfair than RTM: Ashwin criticizes IPL rule

The auction for the IPL 2025 will be taking place at the end of this year. Earlier in August, The Board of Control for Cricket in India organised a "constructive dialogue" with the owners of the ten league franchises on various subjects before formulating the IPL player regulations.

Before the meeting, ESPNcricinfo reported that the significant points of discussion: Having mega auction every five years instead of three, the way it is right now, reinstating the right-to-match card option at auctions, availability/shortage of overseas players and a limit on total number of retentions.

RTM is a rule through which teams can automatically get the player which represented them in the previous season if they match the highest bid placed by a franchise. Teams used this rule in the past to get some valuable players, but in the 2021 mega auction, it was removed in order to give the then-new franchises, Gujarat Titans and Lucknow Super Giants a wider pool of players to choose from.

Speaking about this rule on his YouTube channel, Ashwin said that the rule is unfair to a player and does not give him a fair value.

"There is no rule more unfair for a player than RTM. Because how has the RTM rule been so far? For example, there is a player called X. He is on a team called, let us say, Sunrisers. His current value is around ₹five-six crores. He has gone into the auction. Now say Sunrisers want to buy the player back. So, the Sunrisers will bid for the player at a base price of 2 crore," he said.

"Then, let us say, KKR and the Mumbai Indians are bidding for the player. The bid goes up to 6 crores and finally, they say, 'The player is sold to the Mumbai Indians for 6 crores.' So, with RTM, the Sunrisers will then bid for and take the player at 6 crores. The problem here is that Sunrisers are happy. But KKR and MI are unhappy. The only person happy is Sunrisers. Because, in the beginning, they gave attendance bid at base price," he added.

The ace-spinner said that RTM is unfair because it doesn't give fair value for the player.

"After that, there is no fair value at all. There is a bidder. The KKR and Mumbai Indians are fighting. For one of those teams, it has gone up to six crores. What does SRH say? 'You bought the player, right? Return the player back."

"Very unfair. Because, at this time, SRH has to bid ₹6.20 crores, the other team ₹6.40 crores and they should reach the fair value of the player. The problem with RTM is that it is not fair value for the player. So, if you give three RTMs [to each team], the players will only go virtually empty-handed. Already, they do not get fair value in the auction," he concluded.

This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.