Why the Pacific islands are key
The islands sit on vital sea routes and might hold the key in the battle for the Indo-Pacific. Countering China is, therefore, crucial
Off the northeastern coast of Australia in the Pacific Ocean is a smattering of islands, which form the frontline in the battle to survive in a warming Earth, and the associated vagaries of rapid sea level rise and rash changes in climate phenomenon. Yet, these small islands — sandwiched between the United States (US), China and Australia — also serve another purpose, and an acutely important geostrategic one at that. This remote corner is being transformed by an evolving game of influence waged by two emerging global power blocs — one led by the US and another by China. At stake is control over critical shipping lines and trade routes, establishing a military presence in a sensitive region, and possibly sway over the Indo-Pacific region. And in this game, India may hold the balance.

The US has always maintained a presence in the region but China made the first move last year, ramping up efforts to build closer ties with the islands. A security agreement between China and the Solomon Islands set alarm bells ringing after a leaked draft of the pact showed that Chinese warships would be allowed to dock in the islands, and China could send forces to help in maintaining social order. Despite a push by Beijing, 10 island States refused to sign on a trade and security pact that even envisaged China funding a police training academy and closer cyber-security cooperation. Since then, members of Quad — the US, Japan, India and Australia — have been keeping a close watch. The grouping identified critical needs — a voice in international policymaking, development finance, maritime security and assistance to battle the climate crisis — and moved quickly to highlight China’s predatory lending practices and coercive diplomacy, in a bid to undercut Beijing’s influence.

E-Paper

