E-Paper
Amid 'corruption, nepotism' row, Centre names Justice Sanjay Kumar Agrawal as Rajasthan HC chief justice
The notification came four days after the SC collegium recommended Justice Agrawal, currently a judge of the Chhattisgarh High Court, for the Rajasthan post.
Prefer HTon Google
The Centre on Saturday night notified the appointment of eight new chief justices to high courts, including Justice Sanjay Kumar Agrawal as chief justice of the Rajasthan High Court, amid a controversy over acting Chief Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma after Supreme Court judge Justice Sandeep Mehta accused him of “corruption”, “nepotism”, “favouritism” and misuse of administrative powers.
Justice Agrawal’s appointment could now pave the way for the Rajasthan High Court to have a regular chief justice after nearly a year, potentially easing one aspect of the controversy even as Justice Mehta’s separate demand for Justice Sharma’s transfer out of Rajasthan remains to be acted upon.
The notification came four days after the Supreme Court collegium recommended Justice Agrawal, currently a judge of the Chhattisgarh High Court, for the Rajasthan post. The collegium had also separately recommended his transfer from Chhattisgarh to Rajasthan, a step that would facilitate his movement to the new court.
Also Read | ‘Order can’t be without reasoning': Supreme Court sets aside Allahabad HC ruling
The other appointments notified on Saturday are Justice V Kameswar Rao as chief justice of the Patna High Court, Justice Ravindra V Ghuge as chief justice of the Calcutta High Court, Justice Mahesh Chandra Tripathi as chief justice of the Bombay High Court, Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra as chief justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, Justice Krushna Ram Mohapatra as chief justice of the Chhattisgarh High Court, Justice Alpesh Yashwant Kogje as chief justice of the Madhya Pradesh High Court and Justice Pushpendra Singh Bhati as chief justice of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court.
The Rajasthan appointment assumes significance against the backdrop of three letters written by Justice Mehta to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on August 2, 10 and 17, in which he alleged corruption, nepotism, favouritism and administrative impropriety against Justice Sharma and sought his transfer out of the state. Justice Mehta had also urged the CJI to appoint a regular chief justice from another high court.
Also Read | Bar Council has no business disciplining students, says Supreme Court on law school row
The CJI has indicated that the allegations against a sitting judge would have to be dealt with through the established institutional mechanism and that Justice Sharma would have to be given an opportunity to respond. Justice Sharma has since submitted a detailed response to the CJI, denying the allegations as baseless and factless and stating that he had supported his rebuttal with evidence.
The appointment of Justice Agrawal, therefore, addresses the immediate question of who will head the Rajasthan High Court on a full-time basis. But it does not, by itself, resolve the separate issue raised by Justice Mehta regarding Justice Sharma.
Justice Sharma’s transfer out of Rajasthan has not so far been examined by the collegium, and the allegations made against him remain matters under institutional consideration.
Justice Agrawal’s move to Rajasthan also comes at a particularly significant juncture. He was appointed acting chief justice of the Chhattisgarh High Court following the retirement of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha on September 4, pending completion of the process for his move to Rajasthan.
Justice Sharma, who has been functioning as acting chief justice of the Rajasthan High Court since September 2025, is due to retire on September 26. The arrival of a regular chief justice before then would bring an end to the prolonged period in which the court has functioned under an acting chief justice, while leaving the separate institutional proceedings concerning the allegations against Sharma to be dealt with by the CJI and the collegium.
