Today in New Delhi, India
Apr 22, 2019-Monday
New Delhi
  • Humidity
  • Wind

When Mamata stormed off, leaving Pranab Mukherjee feeling ‘humiliated, insulted’

Former President Pranab Mukherjee recalls in his new book ‘The Coalition Years’ how Mamata Banerjee suddenly demanded an open contest in the Congress’ state unit after advocating elections by consensus.

india Updated: Oct 18, 2017 16:01 IST
Press Trust of India
Press Trust of India
Press Trust of India, New Delhi
Pranab Mukherjee,Mamata Banerjee,Pranab book
Pranab Mukherjee with then state Youth- ongress chief Mamata Banerjee after his victory in the biennial poll to Rajya Sabha from West Bengal in 1993. The former President has described Banerjee as a “born rebel”.(HT file)

Former President Pranab Mukherjee has described West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee as a “born rebel” and recalled how she once stormed out of a meeting, leaving him feeling “humiliated and insulted”.

Noting that there was an aura about her which was “difficult to explain but impossible to ignore”, Mukherjee said in his new book ‘The Coalition Years’ that she had built her career fearlessly and aggressively and was the “outcome of her own struggle”.

“Mamata Banerjee is a born rebel,” he wrote, adding that nothing illustrated this trait better than an episode in the West Bengal Congress organisational election in 1992, in which she was defeated.

He recollected how she suddenly demanded an open contest in the party unit after advocating elections by consensus.

The former president recalled that after media reports said the top leaders of the West Bengal Congress, including Banerjee, wanted a consensus election to avoid an open contest that could bring out “ugly factionalism” in the party, then prime minister and Congress chief P V Narasimha Rao asked him to mediate and find a solution.

“One day, during the winter of that year, I requested Mamata Banerjee for a meeting to discuss some of the observations she had made about the process (of organisational elections).

“During the discussion, Mamata suddenly flared up and accused me along with other leaders of a conspiracy against her. She now demanded organisational election, and said she had always stood for elections so that grass-roots level workers could have their say in organisational matters,” he said in the book, the third volume in his series of political memoirs.

Banerjee went on to accuse him and others of “distributing organisational positions” among themselves, “thereby thwarting the electoral process”, he wrote.

Mukherjee said he was “flabbergasted by her reaction and wild allegations” and told her that a compromise formula was being devised at her request and that of other leaders.

But she claimed she was totally opposed to his approach and wanted open elections, he said.

“Having said that she left the meeting in a huff. I was stunned and felt humiliated and insulted,” he wrote.

The former president said she lost by a very narrow margin to Somen Mitra in the election for the post of the WBPCC president held through a secret ballot.

“I was present when that result was announced. An angry Mamata came up to me and asked, ‘Are you happy? Has your desire to defeat me been fulfilled?’ I told her that she was totally mistaken,” Mukherjee recalled.

He told her he had played no role in the organisational election since she had last met him.

The former Congress leader also said the evolution of Mamata Banerjee as a political leader of substance was an important episode in the contemporary politics of West Bengal.

“She has built her own career — fearlessly and aggressively — and what she is today is the outcome of her own struggle, labour and hard work. She has an aura about her which is difficult to explain but impossible to ignore,” he said.

He also said Banerjee emerged as a force to reckon with after the Kolkata plenary in 1997 as has had a spectacular political career.

Mukherjee described as “splendid” her victory in the 1984 Lok Sabha polls, when she defeated CPI(M)’s Somnath Chatterjee from Jadavpur, a constituency that was considered a citadel of the Marxist party.

“This was a splendid victory and she appeared to be truly a giant killer. Throughout her subsequent political life, she has always faced tough challenges bravely and tried to convert them into opportunities,” he said.

First Published: Oct 18, 2017 14:55 IST