Gimme Kashmir: The problem of talking peace with Pakistan
Here is an excerpt from a purported meeting between top policy makers agonising over whether we should talk to Pakistan:
Here is an excerpt from a purported meeting between top policy makers agonising over whether we should talk to Pakistan:

Top boss: We can’t give up talking to Pakistan. If we call off the talks we’ll be playing directly into the terrorists’ hands.
Big shot: The people want peace. That’s why we want the Ghulam Ali concert to be held.
Flunkey: Is he a terrorist?
Big shot: No clue. I haven’t heard him sing.
Sceptic: But our leaders have been talking and meeting and yet the terrorists keep coming.
Top boss: You must realise Pakistan is no ordinary country. It has non-State actors.
Big shot: Terrorists are non-State actors. Nawaz Sharif is a State non-actor.
Top boss: To simplify things, I’ve made a chart of all their power centres. 1) State actors — a rare breed; 2) State non-actors — most of the administration; 3) Non-State actors including 3a) bad Taliban — Taliban in Pakistan; 3b) Good Taliban — in Afghanistan; 3c) Bad terrorists — terrorists against Pakistan; 3d) Good terrorists — against India; 4) State within a state — Pakistan army; 5) State within a State within a State — ISI; 6) Rogue elements within 1&4&5; 7) pseudo-State actors — the Hurriyat; 8) sectarian outfits; 9) Dawood Ibrahim and 10) non-State non-actors — the people. All of them gang up with and fight with everybody else. To make things interesting, terrorist outfits constantly change their names, the Jaish-e-Something becoming the Lashkar-e-Something else or the Harkat-e-Whatever whenever they feel like it. So there’s absolutely no point talking only to Nawaz Sharif. Why, sometimes even Nawaz refuses to talk to Sharif.
Sceptic: Yes, what’s the point in talking peace if he can’t deliver it?
Top boss: The solution is — we must talk to all of them.
All: Hear, hear.
Sceptic: What if the terrorists attack again?
Big shot: Talk harder. We could even stage a cross-border raid and give them a severe talking-to.
Sceptic: What if they still don’t listen?
Top boss: We must nag them into submission.
All: Thank God, we now have a strategy. Hurray.
Minion: Er ... what should we talk to them about?
Top boss: Good point. So that you all know what to talk about, I’m playing the video of the last India-Pakistan talks between the advisors of both countries:
Pak envoy (loudly): We must as good neighbours strive our utmost to mend relations between our two great countries ...
Indian envoy (muttering to himself while the Pakistan envoy is holding forth): Oh yeah? Really? Ha ha. Bloody terrorist. Bloody terrorist. Bloody terrorist. Bloody terrorist.
Indian envoy (loudly): We owe it to our people and future generations and the world to bring peace ...
Pak envoy (mutters to himself while the Indian envoy is talking): Balderdash. Utter rubbish. Bloody hypocrite. We want Kashmir. Gimme Kashmir. Gimme Kashmir. Gimme Kashmir. Gimme Kashmir.
manas.c@livemint.com
Manas Chakravarty is Consulting Editor, Mint
The views expressed are personal
ABOUT THE AUTHORManas ChakravartyThe PM’s speech in Toronto contained the analogy that while India and Canada growing separately would be a2 + b2, when joined together in friendship they would be (a+b)2 which equals a2 +2ab+b2, with the synergy giving an extra 2ab.Read More

E-Paper


