Sign in

By the book: UP CM’s convention technically appears to be on strong footing

When Ramgopal Yadav summoned the convention on Friday afternoon, he was in the party and was the national general secretary and the parliamentary board member. He claims to have an authority to convene the convention.

Updated on: Jan 2, 2017, 01:00:05 IST
Hindustan Times, Lucknow | By
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

Samajwadi Party (SP) national president Mulayam Singh Yadav may have declared the ‘extraordinary emergency national convention’ ultra vires and expelled national general president Ramgopal Yadav, national vice-president Kironmoy Nanda, and Rajya Sabha member Naresh Agrawal, but the numbers, technicalities and the homework done by the Akhilesh-Ramgopal duo appear to hold them on a strong footing.

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and newly unanimously elected party's national president Akhilesh Yadav with his supporters during Samajwadi party national convention in Lucknow on January 1. (PTI Photo)
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and newly unanimously elected party's national president Akhilesh Yadav with his supporters during Samajwadi party national convention in Lucknow on January 1. (PTI Photo)

When Ramgopal Yadav summoned the convention on Friday afternoon, he was in the party and was the national general secretary and the parliamentary board member. He claims to have an authority to convene the convention. Akhilesh, however, by any capacity had no constitutional authority to summon a national convention. He is neither in the state body or the national body.

Soon after Ramgopal called the convention, Mulayam sacked him on Friday night and technically he had no right to hold the convention. But when Mulayam revoked his expulsion, Ramgopal, at the time of the convention, automatically had the authority.

Read| Tug of war over bicycle: SP infighting now reaches Election Commission office

Ramgopal, who was again expelled by Mulayam two hours after the convention, had been doing the homework for the convention for the last two months.

“Thousands of party workers and leaders wrote to me seeking a convention,” he had been saying. He has letters to show to the Election Commission or the court of law to prove his point.

Read| Yadav family feud: Akhilesh takes control, unseats father Mulayam as SP chief

At the time of the convention, all the MLAs (except Pawan Pandey), MLCs (barring five youth leaders like Sunil Sajan or Udaiveer Singh), MPs, senior leaders, were in the party. All of those who attended the meeting were authorised party members. SP had elected Mulayam the national president at the last convention .

The day before the convention, 214 MLAs and 50 MLCs had signed a register when they attended the meeting convened by Akhilesh. Against this, Mulayam had the support of only five MLAs, giving a clear majority to Akhilesh.

Akhilesh and Ramgopal did a strong documentation of the proceedings — in writing, photography, signatures, and videography. Akhilesh deployed drone cameras and crane-mounted cameras to document Saturday’s meeting and the Sunday’s convention.

Ramgopal and Akhilesh have a plan B too. Reportedly, in any such event if they don’t get the SP name and symbol in time, they have made plans to contest elections as a party. Ramgopal has reportedly been in talks with Samajwadi Janata Party (Rashtriya)(SJP-R) that has the banyan tree as its symbol. They have more such options.

For the latest updates on the Yadav family feud, click here

  • Pankaj Jaiswal
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Pankaj Jaiswal

    Pankaj Jaiswal is Bureau Chief, Uttar Pradesh. He covers-analyses politics, and assists Hindustan Times reporters across the state. He has 30 years of experience in print media reporting. Based in Lucknow, he started his journalism career at a national English daily in Kanpur after graduating from Christ Church College. He joined Hindustan Times, Lucknow edition, as part of the launch team in 1997. He’s covered everything from rural distress to science, environment, wildlife, and crime. He has travelled extensively in Uttar Pradesh for rural, development, political, and election reporting. His continued interest in rural issues, rural distress, and development journalism has fetched him a handful of prestigious awards and fellowships. Pankaj is a photojournalist too. He clinched the Statesman Award for Rural Reporting—First Prize in 2009 and Third Prize in 2006—for exposing Bundelkhand’s devastating drought and distress: crop failures, farm suicides, migration, debt, and the injustice of meagre compensation cheques between Rs 10 and Rs 20 to farmers by the government from crop loss. He also has been awarded with Hindustan Times internal 'Journalist of the Month' citation over half a dozen times. His relentless reporting in Hindustan Times pulled the Bundelkhand crisis out of obscurity and forced it into the national spotlight, prompting media and government action on one of India’s most neglected regions. Over a decade, he filed hundreds of hard-hitting stories, travelling repeatedly from Lucknow deep into Bundelkhand. He also received the Special Mention KC Kulish International Award 2009. Pankaj also did long-haul political reporting on the most intense political family feud—’The Yadav Family Feud’—between 2016 and 2022.Read More