Sign in

Rationalists shot dead: CBI seeks another 6 weeks from HC to submit report on murder weapon

Though CBI had sought the court’s permission in August to send the forensic samples to the Scotland Yard, for an ‘advanced analysis’, the probe agency is yet to despatch samples

Updated on: Sep 30, 2016, 00:21:13 IST
Hindustan Times | By , Mumbai
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) told the Bombay high court on Thursday that it will take “six more weeks” to get the ballistics report from Scotland Yard that will help it conclude whether or not a single firearm was used to murder rationalists Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare, and Kannada scholar MM Kalburgi.

Supporters take part in the funeral procession of Govind Pansare, who was shot dead by unidentified assailants in Kolhapur in 2015. (HT file photo)
Supporters take part in the funeral procession of Govind Pansare, who was shot dead by unidentified assailants in Kolhapur in 2015. (HT file photo)

While the CBI had sought the court’s permission in August to send the forensic samples to the Scotland Yard, for an ‘advanced analysis’, the probe agency is yet to despatch samples.

On Thursday, however, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, who appeared for the CBI, told the high court that “it was only a matter of days now,” since, it was “anticipating an affirmative communication from the Scotland Yard,” following which, a “senior official will be sent there with the samples and he will return only once he gets the ballistics report.”

At this the division bench said that this was the “last chance” that it would grant to the probe agency to secure the report. The bench was hearing a plea filed by Dabholkar and Pansare’s family seeking expedition of probes and that their progress be monitored by the court. While Dabholkar was killed in Pune in 2013, Pansare was murdered in Kolhapur last year.

The CBI and the state CID’s special investigations team (SIT), which are probing the Dabholkar and Pansare murders respectively, have been citing the delay in obtaining the ballistics report as an ‘excuse’ for the scanty progress made in their probes. On Thursday, the bench also pulled up the SIT saying that the progress reports submitted in sealed covers before the bench were more of a “thesis” than a probe report.

“You (SIT) have been submitting such reports after reports in court. But when will these theses take a concrete shape and translate into action. Why don’t you accept that you are incompetent for until the CBI came into the picture you had not done anything,” the bench observed.

HC is likely to take up the matter for further hearing on November 23 .

  • Ayesha Arvind
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Ayesha Arvind

    Ayesha Arvind is a Senior Assistant Editor specialising in legal and judicial reportage. She covers High Courts and tribunals across southern India, and believes that important legal developments do not only come from New Delhi. Her work focuses on bringing significant decisions and developments from the region to a wider audience and explaining what they mean beyond the courtroom. She tries to make legal material accessible by translating legal jargon into clear, readable prose and putting pleas, lawsuits, judgments and legal developments in context. She also looks at their political realities and practical consequences for people. Ayesha is committed to the standards of integrity journalism requires. She places a premium on accuracy and fairness, and believes that journalism's powerful voice must be tempered by humility and a sense of proportion. Over almost two decades in journalism, she has covered law and order, civil law, crime and other areas of legal affairs. Her work includes breaking news, legal affairs stories, online analysis and commentary. Ayesha is deeply interested in the law, court judgments and the Constitution because they shape everyday life. She believes every citizen should have a basic understanding of them. What she enjoys most about covering courts is that every story brings something new to learn.Read More