Babri Masjid verdict || What’s next in the cards?

Sep 27, 2018 19:51 IST
about the video
The Supreme Court has declined to set up a larger bench to revisit a 1994 verdict which held that a “mosque is not an essential to the practise of Islam”, ruling that the top court had made the observation in the limited context of acquisition of land. Hindustan Times’ Legal Editor Ashok Bagriya explains the implications of the apex court’s verdict. “All mosques, all churches and temples are significant for the community,” the three-judge bench said in a 2:1 majority decision delivered by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justice Ashok Bhushan. The third judge, Justice S Abdul Nazeer, delivered a dissenting judgment. (HT Correspondent)