Sign in

After the IIT Bombay death, student suicides in focus: The response so far, and the questions ahead

Counselling, faculty training, hostel changes, and a task force set up by SC, a look at steps taken to address the issue and what may still be needed.

Published on: Sep 21, 2026, 15:10:15 IST
Share
Share via
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin
  • whatsapp
Copy link
  • copy link

The death by suicide of a second-year BTech student at IIT Bombay last week, followed by three days of protests on the Powai campus, has renewed scrutiny of student suicides across the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs).

Students hold candles in memory of Sahil Wakode, a second-year IIT Bombay student who died by suicide, during a candlelight tribute on the IIT-Mumbai outside gate, Powai, Mumbai. (Photo by Satish Bate/ Hindustan Times)
Students hold candles in memory of Sahil Wakode, a second-year IIT Bombay student who died by suicide, during a candlelight tribute on the IIT-Mumbai outside gate, Powai, Mumbai. (Photo by Satish Bate/ Hindustan Times)

The Union education ministry in July 2023 informed Parliament that 39 students died by suicide in the five years between 2018 and 2023 across IITs. According to an independent assessment, the number of deaths could be higher.

The issue of student well-being is not isolated to IITs but the cases are in the spotlight because these are among the most prestigious and competitive institutes for studying sciences in the country.

A look at what IITs and the Centre have done, what official inquiries have found, and what may still be needed:

Actions taken so far

In a written reply to Parliament on August 10, Union minister of state for education Sukanta Majumdar said the education ministry had drawn up an “Integrated approach for Promoting Positive Mental Health, Resilience, and Wellbeing” under the Malaviya Mission Teacher Training Programme (MMTTP), a national capacity-building scheme for higher education faculty. Under this, fortnightly sessions were being held with faculty members to help them identify and address student mental-health concerns at an early stage, he said.

Majumdar also cited the annual National Wellbeing Conclaves — at IIT Hyderabad in 2024 and IIT Bombay in 2025 — along with a regional mental-health workshop at IIT Madras in July this year, and counselling and wellness centres set up across IIT campuses. Similarly, workshops on mental wellness and stress management have been held at IIT Madras, IIT Delhi, IIT Guwahati, IIT Gandhinagar and IIT Roorkee.

Some institutes have gone beyond counselling to make physical changes to hostels, aimed at restricting access to common means of suicide. IIT Kanpur, in March this year, removed embedded clothes-drying pipes from hostel rooms and begun fitting spring-loaded devices in ceiling fans. The mechanism is designed to sound an alarm and lower the fan if excessive weight is applied.

IIT Bombay said on Sunday (September 20) it was considering replacing ceiling fans in hostel rooms with wall-mounted units, though officials said the decision predated the recent death and was part of routine maintenance.

Also read: Who is Suryanarayana Doolla? IIT Bombay professor in focus in student suicide case

Findings of Supreme Court task force

The interim report of the Supreme Court-appointed National Task Force (NTF) on student mental health, released this June, flagged gaps in institutional preparedness. Faculty members across IITs felt “ill-equipped” to address mental-health issues, and “90% lacked adequate training to support students facing such concerns”, the panel said.

The top court constituted the NTF in March 2025 after taking note of a “disturbing pattern” of student suicides across higher educational institutions. The move came while the court was hearing a case concerning the deaths of two IIT Delhi students from Scheduled Caste communities in 2023, whose families had alleged caste-based harassment and sought registration of FIRs. The court had said the recurring suicides pointed to the “inadequacy and ineffectiveness” of the existing legal and institutional framework in addressing students’ mental-health concerns and preventing suicides.

According to the panel’s report, responses from 31 centrally funded institutions, including 23 IITs, showed that although 18 institutes had at least one mental-health service provider, only four reported formal training for faculty mentorship programmes and only 10 reported formal training for peer-support initiatives.

The panel noted that the term “counsellor” was used inconsistently across institutes, making it hard to assess how many trained mental-health professionals were actually available.

Faculty members who spoke to the NTF described a “relentless culture of academic competition” at the IITs, where success was defined narrowly by grades, ranks and placement packages. Counsellors, the panel found, often became aware of distressed students “too late” because of the absence of proactive screening and integrated reporting systems involving faculty and hostel staff.

Social inclusion

The NTF drew attention to social inclusion on campuses.

Citing figures placed before Parliament in 2023, it noted that of 3,542 students who dropped out of seven IITs between 2018 and 2023, nearly 60% belonged to reserved categories — 2,066 Other Backward Class (OBC), 1,068 Scheduled Caste (SC) and 408 Scheduled Tribe (ST) students.

Caste-based discrimination on campuses remained “rampant”, the report said, pointing to a mismatch between student and faculty representation. Around 60% of IIT students come from SC, ST and OBC communities, but faculty representation was 6.6% for SCs, 2.1% for STs and 21.3% for OBCs, it noted.

Dr Aqsa Shaikh – professor at Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Delhi, and an NTF member – told HT institutes needed to involve students in designing wellbeing interventions. “I think it is important that when policies are made for the students, it is not just conveyed to them, but they are also at the table where these policies are framed. It is important to see students as not just beneficiaries of the interventions but as co-architects of any framework that looks at their wellbeing,” she said.

“Academics at IITs can be extremely demanding, and there is constant pressure around grades, internships and placements. Many students feel faculty members are not always approachable and that concerns raised by students are not taken seriously. While institutes talk about mental wellbeing, the support often feels inadequate when students are going through difficult periods. The opportunities are excellent, but so is the pressure, and many students feel more needs to be done to support mental health," a second year BTech student at an IIT told HT.

Also read: Suryanarayana Doolla, IIT Bombay professor, suspended from deanship amid student suicide probe

Inquiries under way

IIT Delhi last month constituted a committee headed by retired Delhi high court judge Justice Mukta Gupta to examine the death by suicide of a 31-year-old MSc student on August 22. The committee, which is to submitted a report by September-end, has been tasked with looking at the circumstances leading to the death and any institutional lapses that may have contributed to it.

After a PhD student died by suicide at IIT Kanpur earlier this year, the Union education ministry on January 22 set up a three-member panel to review the implementation of mental-health guidelines, examine the adequacy of counselling and grievance-redressal systems, identify institutional gaps and recommend measures to prevent suicides.

A member of the panel said on Sunday the committee had submitted its report, but the ministry was yet to make the findings public.

At IIT Bombay

IIT Bombay on Monday suspended a professor named in an FIR over the student’s death and apologised for its initial statement that said the youngster was caught cheating using ChatGPT during an examination just hours earlier.

“We apologise for the statements contained in our earlier communication concerning the circumstances” surrounding the student’s death, the institute said.

“The details and circumstances leading up to the incident remain subject to investigation by the appropriate authorities. In view of the ongoing investigation, it was inappropriate to have set out or characterised details relating to the events preceding his demise before they had been duly established through the appropriate investigative process,” it added.

The statement came as IIT Bombay’s Powai campus remained on edge amidst student protests over the youngster’s death.

The student’s father has named a dean of student affairs – the professor now suspended pending inquiry – alleging abetment of suicide on grounds of caste discrimination. The FIR was registered an FIR on charges of abetment of suicide under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Discussing suicides can be triggering for some. However, suicides are preventable. If you need support or know someone who does, please reach out to your nearest mental health specialist.

Helplines: Aasra: 022 2754 6669; Sneha India Foundation: +914424640050 and Sanjivini: 011-24311918, Roshni Foundation (Secundrabad) Contact Nos: 040-66202001, 040-66202000; ONE LIFE: Contact No: 78930 78930, SEVA: Contact No: 09441778290

  • Sanjay Maurya
    ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    Sanjay Maurya

    Sanjay Maurya is a Principal Correspondent with Hindustan Times, where he covers education, with a focus on school and higher education, competitive examinations, education policy and governance. Working as part of the National Bureau, he is based in New Delhi and reports on the Ministry of Education and covers various statutory bodies like UGC, AICTE and NCTE and autonomous bodies like CBSE and NCERT. His reporting also tracks the implementation of key government reforms and policies from school education to higher education including in IITs, NITs, IIMs, central and state universities, and their impact on students and educational institutions. His reporting on the irregularities and rushed implementation of CBSE's On-Screen Marking (OSM) system for evaluation of Class 12 board exams 2026, triggered administrative action, leading to the transfer of the board's two senior-most officials and the constitution of a committee to probe alleged irregularities in procurement process of the system. He joined Hindustan Times in December 2024. Prior to that, he had a three-year stint at Careers360, where he reported on school and higher education, entrance examinations, admissions, rankings and various education policies involving universities and professional education bodies. Over the years, Maurya has reported extensively on major developments in India's education sector, including the implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, reforms in the National Testing Agency (NTA) following the NEET-UG 2024 controversy, changes in school education, higher education regulation, and the evolution of entrance examinations such as NEET, JEE and CUET. He regularly produces data-driven and explanatory stories based on government documents, parliamentary proceedings, court records and official data. His focus remains on helping readers understand how education policies and institutional decisions affect millions of students, teachers and educational institutions across the country.Read More