E-Paper
The $26 Million Cyberheist Rocking a Small New Jersey Town
In historic Cranbury, residents are confronting local leaders over missing money that wasn’t disclosed until after the election.
Prefer HTon Google
CRANBURY, N. J.—This historic village, established in 1697, drips with charm. White clapboard houses on Main Street proclaim their vintage—“Built by John Nesbit 1804” reads one plaque—and locals proudly share that George Washington and Alexander Hamilton met here in 1778 ahead of the Battle of Monmouth.
But now Cranbury, a town of about 4,000 people, is reeling from a distinctly modern catastrophe: a cyber theft to the tune of $26 million after they were tricked into wiring money to the wrong place for a land purchase.
On Monday night, residents packed the Cranbury Public Library, spilling past seats into an overflow room. They stepped to the microphone for three minutes each, demanding to know how a heist of this scale occurred, what it means for taxpayers, and why locals weren’t told of the Sept. 28 incident until Friday, three days after an election for one of five township committee seats.
“My heart is simply broken for Cranbury,” Mayor Lisa Knierim told the gathering, her voice catching. “Your anger is valid, your fear is valid.”
People cheered when Police Chief Giuseppe DeChiara confirmed that the municipality would regain the $17.3 million that was seized before thieves could spirit it out of reach. Yet that still leaves nearly $9 million unaccounted for, and the town attorney said it isn’t known how much Cranbury could recoup under its $5 million insurance policy.
Beyond the staggering financial hit, the crime has shaken public trust in local leaders. “I respectfully want to tell the township committee that the buck really should stop with you all,” said Jim Grossnickle, 56, who works in telecommunications. He later vowed to recruit candidates to challenge the incumbents up for re-election next year.
Local governments across America are increasingly lucrative targets for cybercriminals, who deploy malicious software, phishing emails or subtly altered digital addresses to infiltrate government business. The sheer size of the Cranbury theft makes it a major outlier, said cybersecurity expert Ben Bernstein of Huntress Labs.
“Grabbing $26 million in one shot puts this in the upper tier of public-sector thefts,” he said.
Cranbury is no stranger to high-stakes political drama. In 1804, Aaron Burr swapped horses here after killing Alexander Hamilton in their duel and fleeing south. More recently, the community fractured over a proposal to seize farmland by eminent domain to satisfy affordable-housing mandates—a feud that inadvertently set the stage for the current cyber crisis.
After abandoning the farmland idea, the township pivoted to a plan involving buying other land for $26 million with bond proceeds. This is the money thieves diverted Sept. 28.
Questions of political calculation
At Monday’s meeting, officials didn’t give specifics of the crime, citing a continuing multiagency investigation. Police Chief DeChiara, however, began piecing the timeline together for constituents.
He said the town had received “fraudulent wiring instructions” before transmitting the money. Within minutes of being alerted to possible fraud, his team descended on Town Hall, and he called the Federal Bureau of Investigation. As for the initial silence, he said he had put a gag order on Cranbury staff and officials and had repeatedly rejected requests by Knierim and her four fellow committee members to go public.
“If we tipped our hand too early, they could have liquidated everything,” DeChiara said of the thieves. Over time the chance to claw back money faded, he said, and on Friday, Nov. 6, Cranbury Township released a public statement.
Some residents, however, saw a dark ulterior motive in the timing: that the all-Democratic committee didn’t want bad news to hurt a Democratic candidate’s chance to win on Nov. 3.
“We’re expected to believe that it’s a coincidence that you suddenly felt comfortable releasing this information at 3 p.m. last Friday afternoon, right after the election?” Carol Haring asked during her turn at the microphone.
Haring, who was the Republican candidate in that race, lost by 27 points, a margin some villagers argued showed the contest was never close.
Fellow resident Fran McGovern questioned the sequence of events, too, while also suggesting municipal incompetence and a sleepy village caught out of its depth. “The world is perhaps too sophisticated for Mayberry,” he said.
DeChiara rejected any political motive. “I’m telling you right now, it had nothing to do with an election,” he said.
‘A little bit absurd’
All weekend, the bombshell news consumed the enclave, where the median household income is $217,000. It dominated chatter at places like Cranbury Pizza on Main Street. “Fear and angst, those are the two biggest things,” noted Jay Taylor, a former mayor whose ancestors settled locally in the 1700s, back when it was spelled Cranberry.
Anticipating high turnout, officials moved Monday’s meeting from Town Hall to the library, where some watched from a TV screen in an auxiliary room, though a series of technical glitches disrupted the feed there and on the Township of Cranbury YouTube channel.
“We can’t hear a thing out there. We can’t see anything,” one man grumbled to the committee. “So I mean, I can see how the money got stolen.”
The breach had also brought scrutiny to Town Hall’s longstanding reliance on a single individual serving simultaneously as chief financial officer, finance director and town administrator. That employee is retiring, Knierim announced at the meeting, and the committee took a first step to create two new positions. The town also hired an accounting firm.
Afterward, residents lingered, trying to make sense of the lapse. Catherine Colaizzo, a 66-year-old chiropractor, accepted the police chief’s explanation for the delayed notification, but she remained baffled by the theft itself.
“I can’t even get on my iCloud account without a two-factor identification,” she argued. “I don’t know how you would transfer $26 million. That seems a little bit absurd.”
Tom Beatty, another resident, who is 55 and works in banking, faulted the committee’s leadership: “I believe they were asleep at the wheel and they were complacent.”
Knierim, who was chosen by the committee to be mayor, said it stung to lose the trust of friends and neighbors, but that she isn’t going anywhere.
“I’m not hiding in my house,” she said in an interview Tuesday. “I’m happy to meet with a resident one on one. And if I have to spend the rest of this year and into next year doing that as a committeewoman, then I’m going to do it.”
Write to Scott Calvert at scott.calvert@wsj.com
