[

ram lalla

]
PAGE 2

Latest from ram lalla

The SC’s Ayodhya mediation offer is pragmatic and wise

The apex court recognises the limitations of the judicial process, and attempts to secure its own legitimacy.
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on March 8, 2019, referred the Ayodhya dispute for mediation in a bid to heal minds and hearts.(Biplov Bhuyan/HT PHOTO)
A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on March 8, 2019, referred the Ayodhya dispute for mediation in a bid to heal minds and hearts.(Biplov Bhuyan/HT PHOTO)
Updated on Mar 25, 2019 08:29 AM IST
Copy Link
ByArghya Sengupta

Ayodhya case sent to 3 mediators including Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, get 4 weeks

The Supreme Court appointed a panel for mediation in the Ayodhya case. The panel has to submit its report in four weeks.
Updated on Mar 08, 2019 12:27 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By

Ayodhya dispute: Parties split on mediation process

Hindu organisations Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas (RJN), Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Hindu Mahasabha and seers of Ayodhya opposed mediation, saying it would delay the process.
Several Hindu parties in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit opposed on Wednesday any mediation process to resolve the politically sensitive issue even as Muslim parties said they would “honour” the Supreme Court’s decision.(File Photo)
Several Hindu parties in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit opposed on Wednesday any mediation process to resolve the politically sensitive issue even as Muslim parties said they would “honour” the Supreme Court’s decision.(File Photo)
Published on Mar 06, 2019 11:01 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, Lucknow | ByPawan Dixit and M Tariq Khan

Supreme Court to take up Ayodhya dispute case today

Ayodhya land dispute case: The court is hearing 14 appeals against a 2010 Allahabad high court judgment that trifurcated the 2.77 acre disputed compound between the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhada and representatives of the child deity, Ram Lalla.
Ayodhya land dispute case: The Supreme Court had fixed March 6 as the date for passing its order on whether to appoint a mediator and gave eight weeks’ time for verification of the translation of the documents, translations and records in the case.(Biplov Bhuyan/HT Photo)
Ayodhya land dispute case: The Supreme Court had fixed March 6 as the date for passing its order on whether to appoint a mediator and gave eight weeks’ time for verification of the translation of the documents, translations and records in the case.(Biplov Bhuyan/HT Photo)
Updated on Mar 06, 2019 10:33 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By

‘Give mediation a chance’: Supreme Court says on Ayodhya case

Supreme Court said even if there is a 1% chance of an amicable resolution of the issue, it should be given a chance.
A Supreme Court Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi took up the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case.(REUTERS)
A Supreme Court Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi took up the politically sensitive Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case.(REUTERS)
Updated on Feb 26, 2019 01:21 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | By

Ayodhya, Rafale cases to come up in Supreme Court today

The new Supreme Court Constitution Bench is expected to fix a date to begin the hearings and prepare a schedule. The top court will also consider the review petitions filed in the contentious Rafale aircraft deal against its December 14 judgment “in chambers” later in the afternoon.
Supreme Court, in New Delhi, India. Image for representation.(Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
Supreme Court, in New Delhi, India. Image for representation.(Amal KS/HT PHOTO)
Updated on Feb 26, 2019 07:06 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Same Supreme Court bench to hear new plea on Ayodhya dispute

The Supreme Court said a fresh petition challenging the constitutional validity of the law under which the Centre acquired the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site and land around it will be heard by the five-member bench hearing the main title suit.
The petitioners submitted that the Acquisition of Certain Areas of Ayodhya Act, 1993 infringes on the right to religion of Hindus guaranteed and protected under the Constitution.(File Photo)
The petitioners submitted that the Acquisition of Certain Areas of Ayodhya Act, 1993 infringes on the right to religion of Hindus guaranteed and protected under the Constitution.(File Photo)
Published on Feb 15, 2019 11:00 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | ByHT Correspondent

Plea in Supreme Court challenges 1993 law by which disputed land in Ayodhya was acquired

A fresh plea was filed in the Supreme Court on Monday challenging the constitutional validity of the 1993 central law by which 67.703 acre land, including the disputed premises of Ram Janambhoomi-Babri Masjid at Ayodhya, was acquired.
The government had then acquired 67.703 acre, including the 2.77 acre, through a legislation in 1993. The Ram Janambhoomi Nyas (RJN) is the owner of as much as 42 acre of the acquired non-disputed land.
The government had then acquired 67.703 acre, including the 2.77 acre, through a legislation in 1993. The Ram Janambhoomi Nyas (RJN) is the owner of as much as 42 acre of the acquired non-disputed land.
Updated on Feb 04, 2019 06:53 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | ByPress Trust of India

In 10-second Ayodhya hearing, SC says new bench to be set up before January 10

A 2010 Allahabad high court decision had ordered partition of the 2.77 acre of disputed land in Ayodhya among three parties, namely, deity Ram Lalla, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Sunni Waqf Board.
The Supreme Court also dismissed a fresh petition that asked the top court to give a reasoned order why the Ayodhya case is not being taken up on a “priority order”.(HT Photo.)
The Supreme Court also dismissed a fresh petition that asked the top court to give a reasoned order why the Ayodhya case is not being taken up on a “priority order”.(HT Photo.)
Updated on Jan 04, 2019 10:56 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By

Supreme Court to hear Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case Friday

The apex court on October 29 had fixed the matter in the first week of January before an “appropriate bench”, which will decide the schedule of hearing.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to take up on Friday a(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)
The Supreme Court is scheduled to take up on Friday a(Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO)
Published on Jan 03, 2019 07:34 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | ByPress Trust of India

A house for Ram under PM housing scheme, demands BJP MP Hari Narayan Rajbhar

BJP lawmaker from Ghosi, Hari Narayan Rajbhar, sought a house under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana for Lord Ram as he ‘was living in a tent’, the makeshift sanctum sanctorum of an idol of Ram installed at the disputed spot in 1992.
A Bharatiya Janata Party lawmaker, Hari Narayan Rajbhar, has come up with a curious demand. He wants a house under a government scheme for ‘Ram Lalla’ at Ayodhya.(Twitter)
A Bharatiya Janata Party lawmaker, Hari Narayan Rajbhar, has come up with a curious demand. He wants a house under a government scheme for ‘Ram Lalla’ at Ayodhya.(Twitter)
Updated on Dec 28, 2018 08:08 AM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, New Delhi | By

Supreme Court to hear Ayodhya title dispute on January 4

The matter is listed before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S K Kaul.
The Supreme Court is scheduled to take up a batch of petitions in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case for hearing on January 4.(PTI)
The Supreme Court is scheduled to take up a batch of petitions in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case for hearing on January 4.(PTI)
Updated on Dec 24, 2018 09:18 PM IST
Copy Link
New Delhi | By

BJP doesn’t have patent on Ram temple, says Uma Bharti

Amid growing chorus for the construction of a Lord Ram temple, many political parties and spiritual leaders have demanded that an ordinance should be brought in.
Senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader Uma Bharti said that her party does not have a patent on the Ram temple while calling for all parties to come together to build the temple in Ayodhya.(HT File Photo)
Senior Bharatiya Janata Party leader Uma Bharti said that her party does not have a patent on the Ram temple while calling for all parties to come together to build the temple in Ayodhya.(HT File Photo)
Updated on Nov 27, 2018 02:00 AM IST
Copy Link
Hoshangabad (Madhya Pradesh) | ByAsian News International

New Ram statue will be Ayodhya’s ‘identity’, UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath announces on Diwali

The government is working on the survey and various architects have suggested their designs for the Ram statue, UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath said.
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath(PTI File Photo)
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath(PTI File Photo)
Updated on Nov 07, 2018 02:36 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, Lucknow | By

On Yogi Adityanath’s huge Ram statue, top Ayodhya priest’s sharp retort

The Yogi government’s ambitious project to install the tallest statue of Lord Ram in Ayodhya is facing opposition from Mahant Satyendra Das, the head priest of the makeshift temple at the disputed site.
The Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas has also demanded proper maintenance of the proposed statue of Lord Ram.
The Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas has also demanded proper maintenance of the proposed statue of Lord Ram.
Updated on Nov 05, 2018 04:11 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, Lucknow | By, Lucknow

Mixed response by Ayodhya dispute litigants on Supreme Court’s decision

The Supreme Court on Monday turned down requests for an early hearing in the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi title dispute and said the top court will decide the course of hearings in the first week of January.
In a 2010 decision, the Allahabad high court had ordered the trifurcation of the 2.77 acre disputed site between the Nirmohi Akhada, the Sunni Waqf Board and the deity of Ram Lalla.(HT Photo)
In a 2010 decision, the Allahabad high court had ordered the trifurcation of the 2.77 acre disputed site between the Nirmohi Akhada, the Sunni Waqf Board and the deity of Ram Lalla.(HT Photo)
Published on Oct 29, 2018 11:00 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, Ayodhya/Lucknow | ByPawan Dixit and Tariq Khan

VHP chief visits Ayodhya, says Ram temple will be reality soon

Newly-elected VHP chief Vishnu Sadashiv Kokje on Monday visited the make-shift temple of ‘Ram Lalla’ and said that the dream of seeing a grand Ram temple here will soon be a reality.
Newly-elected VHP chief Vishnu Sadashiv Kokje(extreme left) observing the stone pillars for the proposed Ram Mandir at VHP’s workshop in Ayodhya.(HT Photo)
Newly-elected VHP chief Vishnu Sadashiv Kokje(extreme left) observing the stone pillars for the proposed Ram Mandir at VHP’s workshop in Ayodhya.(HT Photo)
Updated on Apr 24, 2018 02:51 PM IST
Copy Link
Hindustan Times, Ayodhya | BySachchidaNand Shukla, Ayodhya

SC told Ayodhya land dispute more important than polygamy case

A Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra said it will take a decision on referring the Ayodhya land dispute case to a larger bench after hearing all parties to the litigation.
The plea to Supreme Court was made by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan.(Sonu Mehta/HT Photo)
The plea to Supreme Court was made by senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan.(Sonu Mehta/HT Photo)
Updated on Apr 06, 2018 04:31 PM IST
Copy Link
PTI, New Delhi | ByPress Trust of India
SHARE
  • 1
  • 2
Story Saved
×
Saved Articles
Following
My Reads
Sign out
New Delhi 0C
Wednesday, January 19, 2022